Dover, MA Water Supply: The Hidden Contamination Risks Every Homebuyer Must Know

💧I. Overview of Water Supply in Dover, MA

Dover, Massachusetts is a suburban community where most residents rely on private well water and on-site septic systems. Approximately two-thirds of households draw from private wells on their property, since the town has no public sewer system and all buildings use private septic systems for wastewater disposal. The remaining homes are served by small public water systems—including a system run by Aquarion Water Company (formerly Colonial Water) that serves about one-third of the town (around 645 households, mostly near the town center), a town-operated well serving municipal buildings and a school, and a few small neighborhood water trusts.

Given this reliance on groundwater, Dover officials and state regulators pay close attention to water quality. Below is a summary of documented water quality issues, contaminants of concern, and regulatory measures in place to protect drinking water in Dover.

🔬II. Common Water Contaminants and Issues in Dover

☠️PFAS ("Forever Chemicals") in Groundwater

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been detected in Dover's drinking water. In the main Dover public water system operated by Aquarion, testing in 2024 found total PFAS (the sum of six PFAS compounds) at levels approaching the state limit of 20 parts per trillion (ppt). For example, water from the Chickering Drive well field averaged ~17 ppt PFAS (with a peak detection of 20 ppt, right at the Massachusetts Maximum Contaminant Level).

One of Aquarion's smaller Dover systems (the Springdale Farms well system) even exceeded the PFAS limit in late 2022—quarterly samples surpassed 20 ppt, triggering public notices and corrective action. PFAS contamination is concerning because these chemicals persist in the environment and have been linked to health issues (affecting liver, thyroid, immune system, and potentially increasing cancer risks).

Notably, even Dover's town-owned well (at Caryl Park) has had low levels of PFAS—one 2024 sample detected about 3.1 ppt of PFOA (a type of PFAS). In response, local and state officials urge diligence: MassDEP recommends that all private well owners test their water for PFAS contamination, and Dover has shared guidance on treating PFAS in private wells. Aquarion is constructing new treatment facilities to remove PFAS from the public water supply and is pursuing funding and legal settlements to address the issue.

🧪Nitrate Contamination from Septic Systems

Nitrate (NO₃⁻) is a pollutant associated with human wastewater and fertilizers, and it can seep into groundwater from septic system leach fields. In a 2020 hydrology study of Dover's wells, nitrate was detected at elevated levels in several areas of town—seven tested wells showed nitrate above 1 mg/L (which indicates a septic influence above natural background), though all were below the federal drinking water limit of 10 mg/L. One private well exceeded 5 mg/L nitrate, a threshold significant in Dover.

In fact, Dover's Board of Health has adopted a proactive standard for private wells: if a home's well water has nitrate over 5 mg/L, it is considered a concern. The town regulates private wells at a 5 mg/L nitrate limit, requiring treatment upgrades in such cases. (For context, 10 mg/L is the EPA limit, but many public health experts have advocated a stricter 5 mg/L limit for better health protection.)

Homebuyers in Dover typically must get a water quality test during property transfer, and if nitrate exceeds 5 mg/L the seller is required to install a treatment system (often reverse osmosis) to remove it, with a deed restriction to ensure ongoing maintenance of that treatment. Overall, while most tested wells in Dover are below the 10 mg/L federal standard, the presence of nitrates above natural background in multiple wells suggests septic system impacts on groundwater are a reality in the more densely developed parts of town. This underscores the importance of checking nitrate levels in any private well.

🦠Microbial Contaminants (Bacteria)

Because all of Dover's drinking water comes from groundwater, there is also a concern about bacterial contamination—for instance, coliform bacteria or E. coli entering wells from surface runoff or septic leakage. To date, there have been no town-wide bacterial outbreaks reported in Dover's water, but vigilance is necessary at the individual well level.

Dover's regulations require that new wells be tested for coliform and total bacteria and disinfected before use. Similarly, any time a home is sold, the well water must be tested (using a state-certified lab) to ensure it's bacteriologically safe. On the public water side, the Aquarion system monitors for bacteria monthly; in 2024 all routine samples were bacteria-free. (An August 2024 testing glitch did occur—a lab error meant some bacterial samples were analyzed improperly—but follow-up tests still found no coliform presence in the water.)

Private well owners are encouraged to regularly test their water for coliform bacteria, especially if the well is shallow or if any changes in taste/odor occur, since a contaminated well can cause serious gastrointestinal illness. Overall, bacterial contamination does not appear to be a widespread issue in Dover's groundwater, but it remains a critical item on any well inspection checklist given the universal use of septic systems in town.

⚙️Naturally Occurring Minerals (Iron, Manganese)

Dover's groundwater contains some natural mineral contaminants typical of New England's geology. In testing across town, manganese has been noted as elevated in many wells, and iron is also present. These minerals originate from bedrock and soil and are not from pollution per se, but they can affect water quality. Manganese and iron at high levels cause discolored, rusty-orange water and staining, and manganese in particular has health guidelines (MassDEP's health advisory limit is 300 µg/L for manganese, above which infants and susceptible individuals should avoid long-term consumption).

Aquarion has reported that historically the Francis Street wellfield (one of Dover's sources) had high iron and manganese that led to episodes of brownish tap water. After Aquarion took over the system in 2021, they adjusted operations to use a cleaner well and flushed the mains, which initially resolved the discoloration. However, in mid-2023, manganese levels in those wells rose again, causing a return of discolored water until the utility could make further improvements. Aquarion has since reconfigured the system so that water from a different wellfield (Knollwood Drive wells, with lower iron/manganese) is supplied to more of the service area.

Private wells may also have iron/manganese issues depending on local geology—many homeowners install filters or water softeners if these metals exceed aesthetic limits (iron >0.3 mg/L or manganese >0.05 mg/L for staining). In summary, mineral content like iron and manganese is a known water quality complication in Dover, mainly causing aesthetic and maintenance concerns, and is being managed via treatment and source management on the public supply.

🧂Sodium and Chloride (Road Salt)

Another contaminant observed in Dover's groundwater is elevated sodium and chloride from road de-icing salt. Many of the wells tested in the 2020 study showed high salt levels, likely due to infiltration of runoff from salted roads. Sodium in drinking water is not regulated by a maximum contaminant level, but Massachusetts advises that levels above 20 mg/L be reported to local boards of health because it can be a concern for people on low-sodium diets.

Chloride (which, along with sodium, forms salt) at high concentrations can give water a brackish taste and contribute to corrosion. The finding that road salt is impacting many wells suggests that homes near major roads or intersections in Dover could have noticeably higher sodium/chloride in their well water. This is a common issue in New England towns and is something to be mindful of—water softeners do not remove sodium (in fact, they can increase it), so reverse-osmosis or other treatments might be needed if a household requires low-sodium water.

Prospective buyers can check the salt content in a well water test and also inquire if the property has any water softening or conditioning systems in place to address mineral or salt content.

⚗️Acidity (Low pH)

Dover's well water tends to be naturally acidic (low pH) because of the region's geology. Tests have shown that nearly all wells in the area have a low pH (acidic) which is common in undeveloped, granitic bedrock regions. While acidity is not a contaminant by itself, it is an important water quality parameter because corrosive, low-pH water can leach metals like lead and copper from a home's plumbing.

Dover's water quality regulations recognize this and require new wells to be tested for pH and treated if necessary. Many homeowners with private wells install neutralizers (e.g. calcite filters) to raise the pH, protecting their pipes and ensuring metals like lead remain below actionable levels. In the Aquarion public supply, the water is treated to control corrosion; indeed, recent lead and copper sampling in the Dover system showed results well within safe limits (no lead/copper violations, and levels "well below regulatory limits" after system adjustments).

Homebuyers should review any available well test results for pH and consider whether a corrosion control system is in place. In short, mild acidity is a common characteristic of Dover's groundwater, and while not dangerous on its own, it requires monitoring to avoid household plumbing contamination.

✅Absence of Industrial Contaminants

Notably, testing has not revealed significant industrial pollution in Dover's groundwater. For instance, a comprehensive screen for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the 2020 well survey detected no VOCs in any of the wells sampled, and no synthetic organic solvents or gasoline compounds have been reported in the town's water supplies. This indicates there have been no major hazardous chemical spills impacting local aquifers in recent history.

Nevertheless, continued vigilance is warranted, especially along transportation corridors or anywhere fuel oil and chemicals are stored, as these remain potential risks to well water.

🚽III. Septic Systems and Groundwater Concerns

Because Dover has no public sewer, every home and facility in town uses a private septic system or alternative on-site wastewater system. Proper septic maintenance is crucial not only to avoid system failure but also to protect water quality. When septic systems fail or are overly concentrated in an area, they can leak bacteria and nutrients (like nitrogen) into groundwater. Nitrate levels, as discussed above, are a key indicator of septic impact on groundwater—Dover's finding of measurable nitrate in wells in more developed neighborhoods shows that septic effluent is making its way into the aquifer in those areas.

Fortunately, most modern septic systems, if functioning correctly, reduce bacterial contamination risk by filtering effluent through soil. However, older systems or cesspools (legacy systems) can be a weak link. Recognizing this, the Dover Board of Health monitors septic design and replacements closely. All new or repaired septic systems must meet Title 5 state code, and the town encourages residents to pump their septic tanks every two years to prevent leach field failure. Homeowners are asked to submit pumping and maintenance records to the Board of Health, helping ensure compliance.

There is also a public agreement for septage disposal—all septic pumpings are sent off-site to a regional treatment plant, to safely handle the waste and protect the local environment.

In summary, septic systems are the primary possible pollution source for Dover's groundwater, and while the town has strict standards (setbacks, maintenance requirements) to minimize risks, a diligent homeowner will want to confirm that both water and septic systems are in good working order.

🏛️IV. Public Water Systems: Quality and Compliance

Homebuyers moving to a part of Dover served by a public water system (such as the Aquarion Water Company supply or a neighborhood water trust) should review the Consumer Confidence Reports and any public notices for those systems. These reports detail water quality test results and any violations.

In Dover's case, the Aquarion system's latest Water Quality Report highlights the PFAS issue (as noted earlier) and also shows that other regulated contaminants like nitrate, lead, and copper are within safe standards. For instance, in 2024 the Aquarion Dover supply reported nitrate levels around 2–4 mg/L (well under the 10 mg/L limit), and lead/copper sampling in homes showed no exceedances of action levels.

Aquarion has been investing in infrastructure upgrades in Dover, not only for PFAS treatment but also to improve distribution (they reconfigured pump stations and piping in 2023 to draw more water from the best-quality wells and reduce iron/manganese problems). Customers on the Aquarion system are routinely informed of any changes; for example, when PFAS levels rose above the limit in 2022, customers received timely public education notices with guidance on what to do.

Other public water supplies in Dover include very small systems (e.g. the Town's Caryl Park well that serves the Chickering elementary school and a few buildings, and a handful of private water trusts). These are all classified as Public Water Supplies and regulated by MassDEP, which means they undergo regular testing for contaminants like bacteria, nitrates, and PFAS. The town-operated "Dover Water Department" well has had no reported violations; its water showed a low level of PFAS (PFOA ~3 ppt) in 2024 but well under the limit, and it meets all bacterial and chemical standards as of the latest reports.

Neighborhood water trusts that pipe in water from outside Dover (for example, some use Natick's water supply) would rely on those sources' water quality—typically, Natick's water is from the MWRA or local wells and is rigorously treated. Buyers should still obtain the specific water quality report for their system. Dover's Board of Health can assist in identifying which water system a property is on and provide the latest water quality testing results or any issues on record.

📋V. Local Regulations and Testing Requirements for Homebuyers

To protect public health, Dover has strict local regulations concerning wells and water quality. Before any house in Dover is sold, the seller must have the well water tested by a state-certified laboratory and share the results with both the Board of Health and the buyer. This test must include a broad panel of parameters—bacteria, nitrate/nitrite, pH, iron, manganese, chloride, hardness, volatile organic compounds, and more—as specified in the Dover Board of Health's Private Well Regulations.

If that test finds contaminants above health-based limits or local standards, the issue generally must be remedied. For example, as noted, nitrate over 5 mg/L requires installing a treatment system (RO filter) and legally recording its maintenance requirement. Similarly, any presence of coliform bacteria would necessitate well disinfection and a clean re-test before the sale could proceed. These regulations ensure that new homeowners are not unknowingly inheriting a polluted water supply.

Prospective buyers are wise to ask if a well has been tested for PFAS, radon, or arsenic in addition to the standard list—these aren't always required by regulation (for instance, arsenic was not highlighted as an issue in Dover, but testing can provide peace of mind especially if the home has an older deep well).

In terms of wastewater, local laws ensure that septic systems are up to code at the time of property transfer. A passing Title 5 inspection (documenting that the septic is functioning properly) is mandatory in Massachusetts. Dover's health officials emphasize proper septic use and maintenance—e.g., refraining from putting grease, hazardous chemicals, or excessive water down the drains, and regularly pumping the tank—to prolong system life and prevent any leakage that could contaminate nearby wells. There is no evidence of any widespread septic failures causing contamination in Dover, but individual cases can occur if systems are neglected. The Board of Health remains an important resource for residents, providing guidance and oversight on both water and septic concerns.

🏘️VI. Dover's Water Contamination vs. Peer Communities in Metro Boston

Understanding how Dover's water quality issues compare to neighboring towns provides crucial context for homebuyers evaluating multiple communities. The key distinction is between towns with public water/sewer systems versus those relying on private wells and septic systems.

☠️PFAS Levels in Drinking Water

Dover (Private Wells & Small Systems): Dover relies mostly on private wells, with only a small portion of residents served by Aquarion-owned well systems. Recent tests have detected PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in Dover's groundwater. In late 2022, one local neighborhood system (Aquarion's Springdale Farms wells) exceeded the Massachusetts PFAS6 limit of 20 ng/L (ppt). Aquarion issued public notices and began monthly monitoring and planning treatment, and by early 2023 the PFAS levels had dropped below the 20 ppt MCL. Dover's main well system also had detectable PFAS (e.g. PFOA ~8.5 ppt in 2024 at the Chickering Drive well) but generally stayed under the 20 ppt standard. In fact, Aquarion proactively removed one well (Draper Rd.) from service in 2021 due to elevated PFAS, ensuring the town supply met regulations. Overall, Dover's PFAS detections have been moderate—a concern, but not extreme. They are in line with what other well-dependent towns are beginning to find as testing increases.

Towns with Public Water (Wellesley, Weston, Needham, Lincoln): These communities have centralized water systems that undergo regular PFAS monitoring. Notably, Wellesley encountered a significant PFAS issue in 2021–2022: its Morses Pond well treatment plant showed PFAS6 levels of 45.1 ppt, more than double the MassDEP limit. This was an outlier—far higher than anything recorded in Dover. Wellesley responded by shutting down that source, switching to more Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) reservoir water, and installing a granular activated carbon/ion-exchange filter. By mid-2022, PFAS at Morses Pond was non-detectable after treatment, and Wellesley's other wells remained below the 20 ppt limit (all under 11 ppt).

In Needham, which has a municipal supply partly from local wells, testing in 2021–2023 found PFAS present but at single-digit ppt levels, well below the 20 ppt MCL. Weston uses primarily MWRA regional water (surface reservoir supply) and has reported only trace PFAS detections, all under the limit. Lincoln, which has its own town water (from Flint's Pond), likewise saw only minimal PFAS—for example, a 2024 sample showed ~2.0 ppt PFOA, a level considered very low. In summary, among the public water towns, Wellesley experienced an above-limit PFAS spike that required action, whereas Weston, Needham, and Lincoln have so far seen low or no PFAS issues in their delivered water.

Towns with Private Wells (Sherborn, Carlisle): Communities without municipal water are now discovering PFAS in some private wells, much like Dover. Sherborn—which, like Dover, relies on private wells for homes and a handful of small public-supply wells—has documented widespread PFAS impacts. In a 2021–2022 MassDEP free sampling program, 5 of 34 Sherborn private wells (~15%) exceeded the 20 ppt PFAS6 drinking water limit. This rate is significantly higher than the statewide average (~6% of private wells tested exceeded 20 ppt), suggesting Sherborn's groundwater PFAS contamination is relatively severe. An even larger share (over 60%) of tested Sherborn wells had detectable PFAS above 2 ppt.

In general, Dover's PFAS profile is typical of well-reliant towns—detectable "forever chemicals" in some wells, occasionally above regulatory limits, but not uniquely high compared to peers. Wellesley's 45 ppt spike was more acute than anything seen in Dover, while Sherborn's situation underscores that small towns on wells can indeed have multiple PFAS hotspots. Dover falls somewhere in the middle: it has had localized PFAS issues that are of concern but comparable to what other similar communities are grappling with as testing becomes widespread.

🧪Nitrate Contamination from Septic Systems

Because Dover lacks public sewers, nearly all households use septic systems—as is the case in Sherborn, Carlisle, and similar rural-suburban towns. Septic effluent can elevate nitrate levels in groundwater. Dover's water quality studies have found measurable nitrate in some private wells, though generally not at dangerous levels. A 2020 hydrological survey noted that 7 sampled wells showed nitrate indicative of septic influence (nitrate >1 mg/L is above natural background), yet all were below the 10 mg/L drinking water limit. The highest reading was one well at just over 5 mg/L, which exceeds Dover's local guideline (Dover's Board of Health set a stricter 5 mg/L threshold for nitrates).

In fact, Dover regulations require homeowners to install treatment (e.g. a reverse-osmosis filter) if a home's well tests over 5 mg/L nitrate. This proactive standard (50% of the EPA limit) reflects a cautionary approach, but it appears only one known well was in that range as of 2020. Most of Dover's tested wells had lower nitrate, and many had <1 mg/L (typical of unimpacted New England groundwater).

In sewered towns like Wellesley, Weston, and Needham, residential nitrates are a non-issue in the drinking water supply—their water comes from protected sources or MWRA reservoirs with virtually no nitrate, and sewage is sent to treatment plants rather than leaching into local aquifers. For instance, Wellesley's 2022 water report shows no violations of inorganic contaminants like nitrate (and MWRA reservoir water typically has nitrate well below 1 mg/L). Any slight nitrate that does appear in those towns' water sources tends to be from natural soil or minor fertilizer runoff, not septic systems, and remains far under the 10 mg/L limit. Needham's water, for example, met all standards with nitrates not exceeding 1–2 mg/L in recent reports. In short, in the public water communities, nitrate contamination of drinking water is rare and well-controlled.

In well-and-septic towns, low-to-moderate nitrates are common. Sherborn's Groundwater Protection Committee recently compiled private well data and found a substantial fraction with some nitrate presence. In a sample of 41 Sherborn wells, about 39% had nitrate at or above 2 mg/L (a level indicating notable human impact), including a few in the 4–5 mg/L range. The highest Sherborn private well hit 5.1 mg/L—similar to Dover's peak—and the average across wells was ~1.7 mg/L.

So Sherborn's nitrate profile looks very much like Dover's: generally modest levels, but clear evidence of septic influence in more developed pockets. Sherborn also reported that historically 3 of its 14 public supply wells (e.g. wells serving schools, businesses) at some point tested over 5 mg/L nitrate, and several others were in the 2–5 mg/L range. Those higher readings tended to occur in the town's more densely settled center (with smaller lots or older cesspools). This shows that even without sewer, nitrate in groundwater usually stays below the federal 10 mg/L limit in these towns—but it often creeps up into the few-to-several mg/L range in the busiest neighborhoods.

Carlisle likely has a comparable situation; its large lots (2+ acres zoning) help diffuse nitrate, but any village-area wells or legacy dense developments may see a few milligrams per liter. We don't have Carlisle-specific data published, yet nearby towns' experiences suggest it's typical, not unusual, for private well communities to have nitrate levels around 1–5 mg/L in some wells. Importantly, these values are below regulatory limits and not acutely hazardous—they are more of a long-term concern (studies have noted potential health effects at ≥2 mg/L over time). Dover and its peers are paying attention to these trends.

In summary, Dover's nitrate issues are typical for a septic-town: present to a mild degree in groundwater, but generally kept in check by low-density zoning and local health rules. They are neither rare (many similar towns show it) nor more severe than elsewhere—if anything, Dover and Sherborn are ahead of the curve in monitoring and requiring remediation when levels edge upward.

🏛️Reliance on Private Wells vs. Public Water Systems

A key factor in water-contamination risk is whether a town has a public water supply or relies on private wells. Dover's situation—about 100% of homes on private wells and private septic (aside from a few small water systems)—is relatively rare in the Boston metro area. Most suburbs closer to Boston developed public water decades ago. For example, Wellesley, Weston, and Needham all have town-wide water distribution networks serving essentially all residents, and they have sewer systems for waste. In those towns, any contamination that arises can be centrally treated or managed (as Wellesley did with PFAS at its plant). Residents also get annual water quality reports and testing is done continuously by the water departments, catching problems early.

Dover, by contrast, shares the challenges of Sherborn, Carlisle, and similar semi-rural suburbs: no municipal water or sewer means each homeowner is individually responsible for testing and maintaining water quality. This reliance on private wells is typical for small rural towns in Massachusetts but unusual so close to Boston. Only a handful of MetroWest towns—Sherborn, Carlisle, and pockets of Lincoln (plus Dover)—are in this category of near-total well dependence. Lincoln does have a public water department serving much of the town, which puts it more in line with Weston/Wellesley in terms of oversight. Sherborn and Carlisle, like Dover, have resisted installing town water or sewer, preserving a rural character but making water quality a private concern.

This suggests Dover's underlying risk is not unique—if anything, any town with similar geology and land use will see the same issues if they test. The difference is that public water towns actively manage risk: e.g. Wellesley blended or treated water to reduce PFAS exposure once it was discovered, and they can isolate or remediate a contaminated well field. In Dover and Sherborn, if a family's well shows high PFAS or nitrate, the burden is on the homeowner to fix it (install filters, etc.), since there is no central treatment plant to do it for them. This can create inequities—some may not test their water at all, and thus remain unaware.

Local officials in these towns are increasingly trying to bridge that gap by offering guidance and pushing for regular testing. Dover's Board of Health, for instance, provides residents with MassDEP's PFAS guidance documents and has set local water quality standards stricter than state minimums. Sherborn formed a Groundwater Protection Committee that is actively studying well data and urging action where needed.

In benchmarking Dover vs. peer communities, we find that Dover's water concerns are largely typical of towns with similar water setups. PFAS contamination in drinking water has emerged as a region-wide problem in recent years, and Dover is not an outlier—nearby towns have seen equal or worse issues (for example, Wellesley's temporary PFAS exceedance was more severe, and Sherborn has multiple wells over the limit). Conversely, towns on the MWRA system (like Weston/Needham) enjoy very low PFAS levels by comparison, highlighting the benefit of a protected source.

Nitrate levels in Dover's groundwater are in the same range as those measured in Sherborn and are kept below regulatory limits, whereas towns with sewers avoid that problem entirely. The rarity of Dover's scenario lies mostly in its governance structure (no public water/sewer) rather than in the contamination metrics themselves. Within the subset of well-reliant communities, Dover does not appear worse-off than others—in fact, proactive measures like removing a PFAS-tainted well and enforcing nitrate treatment at 5 mg/L show Dover is responding aggressively. In summary, Dover's water contamination profile is comparable to its peers that lack municipal water: PFAS levels and septic-derived nitrates are a known challenge but generally typical in magnitude for the region. The town's situation is certainly more vulnerable than a fully sewered, MWRA-supplied town, but it is not an extreme outlier when compared to similar well-and-septic communities in the Boston metro area. Each of these towns is now grappling with the same issues of "forever chemicals" and nutrient pollution in groundwater, and Dover's experience—while concerning—fits into the broader regional pattern rather than standing out as unusually severe.

✅VII. Conclusion: Evaluating Water Quality Risks in Dover

In summary, Dover's drinking water is generally of good quality but does come with some caveats that homebuyers should investigate as part of their due diligence. Key points to consider include: the presence of PFAS (a known issue being addressed with new treatments), the influence of septic systems on groundwater nitrate levels, and naturally occurring water traits like low pH, iron, and manganese that may require household treatment.

The town and state regulators have documented these issues and put regulations in place—such as mandatory well testing, aggressive PFAS response, and septic maintenance requirements—to mitigate risks. As a prospective homeowner in Dover, one should:

Overall, while Dover does face some water quality challenges—as is common in semi-rural communities with private wells—these issues are well-documented and manageable with the proper precautions. By being informed about PFAS and other contaminants and by conducting thorough water testing, homebuyers can ensure they have safe drinking water. The town's robust regulations and ongoing remediation efforts (for example, PFAS treatment projects and stricter well standards) provide an additional layer of protection. With careful due diligence, prospective residents can enjoy Dover's environment while safeguarding their household's water supply for the long term.

🔗Related Tools & Resources

To further analyze Dover and compare water quality considerations across towns, use these platform tools:

Disclaimer: This guide is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, medical, or professional real estate advice. Water quality conditions can change over time, and individual well conditions vary. Always consult qualified professionals (certified water testing labs, licensed well contractors, public health officials) for specific guidance on your property. Always review the most current water quality reports and test results before making purchasing decisions.