Why $2M+ Deals Are Falling Apart: The Hidden Friction Crushing Luxury Home Sales in Brookline, Newton, and Wellesley
Jumbo loan constraints, 17.5% appraisal gaps, and Massachusetts' new $1M+ withholding tax are creating a perfect storm of transaction failures in Boston's most prestigious markets
The residential real estate market within Greater Boston's inner-ring, high-prestige towns—such as Brookline, Newton, and Wellesley—is experiencing a structural vulnerability characterized by a notable increase in failed transactions. This investigative report examines how aggressive buying behaviors established during the low-rate era have collided with stringent financial realities of a high-rate lending environment, exacerbated by new regulatory compliance pressures including Massachusetts' new withholding tax on transfers over $1 million.
Executive Synthesis: The Collapse of Contingency-Free Confidence
📊I. Executive Synthesis: The Collapse of Contingency-Free Confidence
The residential real estate market within Greater Boston's inner-ring, high-prestige towns—such as Brookline, Newton, and Wellesley—is currently experiencing a structural vulnerability characterized by a notable increase in failed transactions, evidenced by properties returning to market status or having financing commitments rescinded. This investigative report posits that this elevated transaction failure rate stems from a structural misalignment: aggressive buying behaviors established during the low-rate era have collided with the stringent financial realities of a high-rate lending environment, exacerbated by new regulatory compliance pressures.
📈The Quantitative Shift and Market Brittle Competitiveness
The market dynamic in these elite towns requires specific analysis, as median home values consistently place financed transactions far above conforming loan limits, necessitating dependence on Jumbo financing. While certain segments, such as single-family homes in Brookline, have demonstrated exceptional median sales price gains (up 25% year-over-year in one measure), overall transactional data indicates significant instability. For instance, Brookline saw a substantial year-over-year median sale price decrease of 18.0% as of October 2025, alongside an increase in the median Days on Market (DOM). This contradictory data set—high prices being achieved alongside steep volatility and longer market times—strongly suggests that numerous transactions are being initially contracted at inflated valuations but are subsequently failing at the crucial closing stage, thereby generating the observed volume of "Back on Market" listings.
The market currently exhibits a brittle competitiveness. Despite a high competitive rating (e.g., Redfin Compete Score of 75 for Brookline), which drives buyers to submit aggressive offers, the market's transactional velocity is slowing down, indicated by rising DOM. This phenomenon occurs when fervent buyer competition leads to over-leveraged or aggressive contracts that lack the necessary financial robustness to close successfully. The failure of these contracts then feeds back into the market, increasing inventory and volatility, thus slowing the median closing timeline.
🏗️The Three-Pillar Headwind Model
The high frequency of financing failures is attributed to the convergence of three mutually reinforcing structural pressures that create friction at closing:
- •Structural Constraint (Jumbo Dependency): The inherent fragility and heightened scrutiny associated with non-conforming, high-value Jumbo loans.
- •Liquidity Shock (Appraisal Gaps): The inability of highly leveraged buyers to bridge substantial appraisal gaps when forced to utilize cash reserves that are simultaneously required by Jumbo loan covenants.
- •Regulatory Friction (MA Withholding Tax): New compliance mandates, particularly for transfers over $1 million, which introduce unforeseen logistical and cash-flow hurdles at closing for sellers.
🎯Investigative Conclusion Snapshot
The high volume of failed transactions confirms that the market is defined by two primary characteristics: entrenched seller resistance to price corrections and significant underlying financing fragility among leveraged buyers. In this environment, the appraisal gap, combined with Jumbo underwriting standards, serves as the most frequent and identifiable operational trigger for deal termination. This issue is structurally permanent because the chronic, decades-long undersupply of housing in Greater Boston due to restrictive and archaic zoning laws sustains perpetual high demand. This structural shortage guarantees that aggressive bids will continue to outstrip conservative appraisal valuations, cementing the appraisal gap as an endemic structural risk rather than a temporary market aberration. For deeper analysis of Greater Boston's housing supply constraints, see our zoning and supply constraint analysis.
💰II. Financial Headwind I: The Structural Constraints of Jumbo Lending
The reliance on Jumbo financing within the inner-ring Boston suburbs introduces a foundational layer of operational risk and exceptional sensitivity to pre-closing financial reviews.
📋A. Defining the Tipping Point: Conforming vs. Jumbo in MA High-Cost Counties (2025)
The pricing structure of prestigious Boston suburbs dictates that the vast majority of transactions rely on non-conforming financing. For 2025, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) established the High-Cost Conforming Loan Limit for single-family homes in major Massachusetts counties, including Suffolk, Middlesex, and Norfolk—the locations of the targeted prestige towns—at $1,209,750. Any mortgage request exceeding this figure automatically pushes the loan into the Jumbo loan category, which is ineligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Given that median single-family home prices in areas like Newton frequently exceed $2.7 million and median sales in Brookline are often well into the millions, the Jumbo loan threshold is the standard gatekeeper for leveraged purchases. For comprehensive guidance on Jumbo loan requirements and financing strategies, see our Financing Guide.
| County Designation | High-Cost Conforming Limit (1-Unit) | Jumbo Threshold (1-Unit) | Target Town Examples | Financing Reliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Cost MA Counties | Up to $1,209,750 | >$1,209,750 | Newton, Brookline, Wellesley, Cambridge | Extreme (Vast majority of SF/Luxury Condos) |
| Standard MA Counties | $806,500 | >$806,500 | Western/Rural MA Regions | Low to Moderate |
🔍B. The Anatomy of Jumbo Underwriting Rigor and Late-Stage Fragility
The necessity of Jumbo financing significantly elevates the risk profile of the transaction. Because lenders retain the full risk for these non-agency loans, underwriting standards are substantially stricter compared to conventional conforming loans. Lenders typically require higher credit scores, lower acceptable Debt-to-Income (DTI) ratios, and exhaustive documentation and verification of income and assets.
The requirement for post-closing cash reserves represents a critical pressure point. Jumbo lenders routinely mandate that applicants demonstrate significant cash reserves—often the equivalent of six months or more of the total monthly mortgage payment, including Principal, Interest, Taxes, and Insurance (PITI)—held in readily liquid accounts.
Late-Stage Fragility Risk
📊C. The Impact of Elevated Interest Rates on DTI and Borrowing Power
The operating environment defined by elevated interest rates further intensifies the structural fragility of Jumbo lending. Jumbo mortgage rates have been hovering between 6% and 7% since early 2022. This "new normal" rate environment profoundly erodes borrower affordability by dramatically increasing the monthly debt service requirement. This elevated expense pushes otherwise highly qualified, high-net-worth individuals close to or above the stringent DTI limits demanded by Jumbo lenders. Consequently, the financing pool for these high-value properties is constrained, and any minor increase in property taxes, insurance costs, or newly acquired consumer debt discovered during final underwriting can swiftly disqualify a borrower who was marginal on the DTI ratio, resulting in transaction failure.
The combination of mandated high reserves and the unexpected requirement to cover an appraisal gap with cash creates a non-negotiable path to failure for some borrowers. The Jumbo loan commitment is predicated on the maintenance of specific liquid reserves. If the buyer, relying on high leverage, finds they must use these required reserves to cover an unexpected appraisal gap (as is frequent in this market, detailed in Section III), they risk violating the lender's core terms. The act of depleting the reserves to cover the shortfall effectively invalidates the loan covenant, allowing the lender to rescind the commitment.
A related structural observation pertains to multi-family properties. While Jumbo limits apply, recent changes have lowered down payment requirements for owner-occupied multi-family homes (2-4 units) to as little as 5% down, a significant departure from the previous 15-20% requirements. This flexibility encourages higher leverage for investment-focused purchases but simultaneously exposes these transactions to an even higher risk of appraisal failure because Jumbo underwriting for multi-family homes relies on conservative rental income assumptions, further straining the process if the valuation comes in low.
💸III. Financial Headwind II: The Appraisal Gap and Seller Stalemates
The high volume of "Back on Market" listings is directly attributable to the collision between buyer over-aggression (waiving contingencies) and seller inflexibility (price resistance), with the appraisal gap serving as the central mechanism of deal failure.
🎯A. The Competitive Strategy Trap: Waived Contingencies
The Boston area housing market has historically been defined by a crippling housing shortage and critically low inventory (homeowner vacancies around 0.9%), forcing buyers to adopt highly aggressive tactics to win bidding wars. A common strategy has been waiving essential protections, particularly the appraisal and financing contingencies.
In Massachusetts, the standard form Purchase and Sale Agreement does not automatically include an appraisal contingency; it must be explicitly added or proactively waived by the buyer. When a buyer waives this protection, they are legally assuring the seller that they will cover any disparity between the offered purchase price and the eventual appraised value using immediate cash at closing. Waiving this key protection signals strength but introduces extreme financial risk if the buyer is not fully liquid.
💵B. The Mechanics of Cash Shortfall Failure
The valuation crisis is endemic: Appraisals frequently lag the rapidly shifting, highly competitive contracted prices. Examples show substantial gaps, with one instance demonstrating an appraisal coming in 17.5% below the offer price. Another example showed a buyer needing to cover a $40,000 shortfall after waiving their financing contingency.
The Buyer's Dilemma
🏠C. Seller Price Resistance and the "Back on Market" Catalyst
Sellers in prestige markets, insulated by high equity performance in previous years and the continued presence of highly liquid cash buyers, remain reluctant to adjust asking prices to align with the current restrictive financing realities. This resistance creates a pervasive gap between buyer expectations (driven by constrained borrowing power) and seller ambitions (driven by peak market comps).
When an appraisal gap occurs, the most common resolution paths are for the seller to reduce the price, the buyer to cover the difference in cash, or a combination of both. However, in prestige markets, sellers frequently refuse to negotiate downward, leading to an intractable stalemate. Since the leveraged buyer cannot close without full financing, the contract terminates, and the property is immediately re-listed as "Back on Market" (BOM), visibly contributing to the failure statistics being investigated.
This mechanism highlights a structural market divergence. While overall transaction volume in luxury homes (over $2 million) has declined by over 20%, the market remains stabilized by affluent cash buyers. This bifurcation establishes an artificially high price floor, supported only by the most liquid participants. Consequently, the majority of buyers who require Jumbo financing must submit aggressive offers to compete, leading to massive appraisal gaps. The high incidence of financing failures among leveraged buyers is thus an indirect result of the price stability created by the cash market, which effectively poisons the viability of the financed segment.
Recognizing this risk, buyer behavior shows signs of correction. There is increasing evidence that buyers are moving away from contingency waivers and are instead adopting a more cautious approach, reintroducing protections such as the home sale contingency. While this rational shift may lead to fewer offers being accepted by sellers who prefer clean contracts, it should eventually stabilize the market by reducing the peak rate of contract failure driven by unrealistic price commitments.
| Headwind | Prestige Market Factor | Failure Trigger | Closing Outcome | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jumbo Financing Rigor | Loan amount >$1.2M (Jumbo) | Updated DTI/Reserve check fails pre-closing | Rescission of commitment due to violation of liquidity terms | 7 |
| Liquidity Shock | Waived Appraisal Contingency | Appraisal comes in 10-17.5% low | Buyer lacks immediate cash to cover the gap; deal termination | 15 |
| Market Stagnation | High Seller Expectation | Seller refuses to lower price to meet appraisal | Deal terminates; property returns to market ("Back on Market") | 12 |
⚖️IV. Regulatory Headwind: The Massachusetts Real Estate Withholding Tax (830 CMR 62B.2.4)
Effective November 1, 2025, a new regulatory compliance obligation—the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR) withholding tax on high-value real estate transfers—introduces a novel and material friction point at closing, particularly for complex transactions common in inner-ring luxury markets.
📜A. The Compliance Imperative (Effective November 1, 2025)
The Regulation mandates new withholding tax requirements for all real estate transfers—commercial or residential—with a gross sales price equal to or exceeding $1 million. Given the price points in towns like Brookline and Newton, this rule impacts the vast majority of transactions, making it a universal consideration for closings in the target area.
The closing attorney (or settlement agent) assumes the substantial legal burden of acting as the withholding agent. This agent is responsible for ensuring the necessary documentation is provided, calculating the withholding amount, and remitting the tax payment, along with the Transferor's Certification and the withholding tax return (Form NRW), to the DOR within a tight 10 days of the closing. Even if no payment is required due to an exemption (such as the sale of a principal residence), the return and certification must still be filed.
🔧B. Logistical Friction for Complex Transactions
The key logistical vulnerability lies with the Transferor's Certification. While the settlement agent files the return, the seller (transferor) is wholly responsible for the accurate completion of this certification, which details exemption eligibility or provides the data necessary to calculate the tax based on estimated net gain.
Documentation Bottleneck Risk
🌍C. Tax Implications as a Closing Disruptor for Non-Residents
The new regulation poses a direct threat to closing success when the seller is a non-resident of Massachusetts, which includes out-of-state investors, certain entities (corporations, non-resident trusts), or foreign owners, all of which are common in the Boston luxury market. For these transferors, mandatory withholding, ranging from 4% to 8% of the estimated net gain or gross sales price, is required.
This immediate reduction in net cash proceeds creates a significant cash flow shock. If the seller has structured the closing assuming receipt of the full sale amount—perhaps to fund an immediate capital deployment, clear substantial debt, or satisfy the cash requirements for a simultaneous subsequent purchase—the mandatory withholding can cause the seller to refuse the closing table terms. This results in the deal terminating due to financial friction, often masked under general "deal terminated" or "seller backed out" status rather than explicit tax compliance failure.
The tight 10-day timeframe for filing and remittance post-closing places immense pressure on the settlement team to secure perfect documentation before the deal closes. If a discrepancy emerges, the closing agent is forced to either withhold a potentially unexpected amount to meet the deadline or attempt to delay the closing to reconcile the documentation. This regulatory pressure increases transactional fragility.
Furthermore, even transactions intended to utilize tax-deferral mechanisms, such as Like-Kind Exchanges (IRC Section 1031), are affected. While withholding is generally deferred, the transferor must still identify the amount of gain being deferred on the Certification and explicitly consent to personal jurisdiction in Massachusetts for future collection. Errors here or a subsequent failure of the exchange requirements post-closing could lead to an unexpected, immediate tax demand, further complicating the fiduciary duties of the closing agent and increasing liability for all parties.
| Seller Profile | Compliance Documentation | Applicable Withholding Risk | Primary Closing Impediment | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Resident Individual | Transferor's Certification | 4% - 8% of calculated gain/gross sales price | Unexpected cash shortfall for the seller | 22 |
| MA Resident Entity (LLC/Trust) | Transferor's Certification | 4% - 8% (rate varies) | Complexity and potential liability for erroneous classification | 22 |
| 1031 Exchange User | Certification + Consent to Jurisdiction | Deferred, pending successful exchange | Documentation failure leading to unexpected tax demand at closing | 22 |
📊V. Data Analysis and Targeted Market Deep Dive
🏙️A. Metropolitan Market Health Check
The underlying structural challenge of the Greater Boston market is the decades-long supply shortage, which has earned the region a "failing grade" on housing accessibility. This chronic lack of inventory ensures that demand remains high and price pressure is sustained.
Alarming Supply Projections
🏘️B. Town-Specific Dynamics and Market Instability
An examination of key inner-ring suburbs reveals the volatility driven by the aforementioned financial and structural pressures:
📍Newton (Middlesex/Norfolk)
Newton remains a highly sought-after seller's market, characterized by a median list price of $2,762,500 and low inventory (2.3 months supply) as of late 2024. This high price point requires almost universal Jumbo loan dependency, maximizing buyer exposure to the strict underwriting and reserve requirements detailed in Section II. The extended duration on market (median 72 days for current inventory) suggests deals are taking longer to close successfully, or are failing and being relisted. Explore Newton, Brookline, and Wellesley side-by-side using our Town Comparison Tool.
📍Brookline (Norfolk/Middlesex)
Brookline exhibits maximum friction. Although highly competitive (score 75), the median sale price dropped sharply by 18.0% year-over-year as of October 2025. This indicates that the market is attempting a significant price correction to align with elevated interest rates, but sellers are resisting this necessary reduction, maintaining high asking prices. This unwillingness to meet market reality ensures a high percentage of contracts fail at the appraisal and closing stages, driving up the visible "Back on Market" statistics as deals collapse.
✅VI. Conclusion and Risk Mitigation Strategies
🗺️A. Synthesized Findings: Mapping the Failure Pathways
The elevated rate of failed luxury home transactions in prestigious Boston suburbs is not random; it is the predictable outcome of several reinforcing structural and financial vulnerabilities. The primary mechanism resulting in a "Financing Fell Through" status is a cascade failure initiated by buyer overconfidence combined with rigid lending standards.
The Most Common Failure Sequence
🏦B. Recommendations for Lenders and Underwriters
Lenders issuing non-conforming, high-value Jumbo mortgages must enhance their due diligence to account for market volatility. Underwriters should implement stress-testing during the commitment phase to analyze borrower eligibility under scenarios that include marginal DTI increases or potential cash shortfalls due to low appraisals. Furthermore, lenders must mandate stringent, separate pre-closing verification of liquid reserves to ensure that funds intended to cover a potential appraisal gap are explicitly distinct from and do not overlap with the required post-closing reserve minimums.
👥C. Recommendations for Buyers and Counsel
Prospective buyers in these competitive markets must be advised that waiving an appraisal contingency is equivalent to assuming a guaranteed cash liability. Legal counsel should strongly recommend that clients define a specific, realistic appraisal gap payment cap (an appraisal gap clause) within the offer, rather than a full waiver. Crucially, the financing contingency should be drafted to include protective language explicitly allowing termination and deposit recovery if the appraised shortfall would necessitate the buyer using the cash reserves required by the lender for loan qualification. To avoid the loss of earnest money, an attorney should be retained to ensure the mortgage commitment letter is clean and that appropriate written extensions are requested if the loan commitment date approaches without firm financing.
Strategic Buyer Protection
⚖️D. Recommendations for Settlement Agents and Sellers
Given the implementation of the new MA withholding tax on high-value transfers (November 1, 2025), settlement agents must proactively mandate tax consultation requirements for all transfers exceeding $1 million. The Transferor's Certification must be fully completed, reviewed by legal and tax counsel, and finalized well in advance of the closing date to proactively identify exemption status or calculate necessary withholding. This proactive measure is essential to prevent last-minute cash-flow shocks that could lead to deal termination. Finally, for sales involving complex ownership structures (entities, non-residents, or 1031 exchanges) or Jumbo financing, negotiating closing deadlines of 45 to 60 days, rather than the standard 30, is strongly recommended to accommodate the multi-layered financial and regulatory due diligence now required.
Related Analysis & Resources
Market Analysis & Context:
- ARM Reset Crisis 2025-2027 → — Understanding payment shock and liquidity constraints affecting high-value transactions
- Massachusetts Homeowners Insurance Crisis 2025 → — How insurance costs compound financing challenges
- Zoning as the Supply Constraint → — Deep dive into Greater Boston's structural housing shortage
- Fall 2025 Greater Boston Market Buyer Window → — Current market conditions and timing strategies
Town-Specific Market Analysis:
- Newton Market Analysis → — Complete Newton town profile with market data
- Brookline Market Analysis → — Brookline town profile and market dynamics
- Wellesley Market Analysis → — Wellesley town profile and investment insights
Buyer Strategy & Education:
- Real Estate Fraud Red Flags → — Due diligence strategies for high-value transactions
- Town Comparison Decision Framework → — Systematic approach to choosing between prestige markets
- What $1M Bought in Greater Boston (Nov 2025) → — Real transaction analysis at different price points
Interactive Tools:
- Property Analysis Tool → — Assess any listing's valuation and market position
- Town Comparison Tool → — Compare Newton, Brookline, and Wellesley side-by-side
- Financing Guide → — Comprehensive Jumbo loan and financing strategies
- Essential Knowledge Hub → — Core buyer education resources
📚Works Cited
1. Massachusetts Conforming Loan Limits for 2025 - JVM Lending, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.jvmlending.com/blog/massachusetts-conforming-loan-limits/
2. Market Update July 31, 2025 | Blog - Ingvild Brown, accessed December 4, 2025, https://ingvildbrown.com/blog/market-update-july-31-2025
3. Brookline Housing Market: House Prices & Trends - Redfin, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.redfin.com/city/36099/MA/Brookline/housing-market
4. MARKET UPDATE BROOKLINE AND NEWTON, MA - Ingvild Brown, accessed December 4, 2025, https://ingvildbrown.com/blog/market-update-brookline-and-newton-ma
5. Boston Faces New Construction Crisis as Building Permits Plunge - Realtor.com, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/boston-ma-new-construction-permits-housing-report-2025/
6. Greater Boston Housing Earns "Failing Grade" in Annual Report Card | BU Today, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/greater-boston-housing-earns-failing-grade-in-annual-report/
7. 2026 Jumbo Mortgage Guide For Boston's High-Cost Homes, accessed December 4, 2025, https://vamortgagehub.com/2026-jumbo-mortgage-guide-for-bostons-high-cost-homes/
8. Jumbo Loan | Mortgage Lenders | Mortgage Companies in MA, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.drewmortgage.com/jumbo-mortgage-loan/
9. Jumbo Mortgage Guidelines: Key Requirements & Loan Limits - Carlyle Financial, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.carlylefinancial.com/blog/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-jumbo-mortgage/
10. Mortgage Commitment Letters | Boston Real Estate Lawyer Pulgini & Norton, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.pulgininorton.com/mortgage-commitment-letters.html
11. Debt-to-Income Ratios - Fannie Mae Selling Guide, accessed December 4, 2025, https://selling-guide.fanniemae.com/sel/b3-6-02/debt-income-ratios
12. Boston Luxury Housing Market: A 2025 Perspective - Columbus & Over Group - Listings, accessed December 4, 2025, https://search.columbusandover.com/boston-luxury-housing-market-a-2025-perspective/
13. The Impact of Interest Rates on Boston Real Estate in 2025 - Rentastic Blogs, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.rentastic.io/blog/how-interest-rates-affect-boston-real-estate-2025
14. 2025 conforming - jumbo mortgage amount for Massachusetts, accessed December 4, 2025, https://goldcoastmortgage.com/2025-jumbo-loan-limits/
15. Waiving the Appraisal Contingency: What Home Buyers Should Consider, accessed December 4, 2025, https://info.buyersbrokersonly.com/blog/waiving-the-appraisal-contingency-what-home-buyers-should-consider
16. How Does the Financing Contingency Work? - Redfin, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.redfin.com/blog/financing-contingency/
17. Appraisal came in much lower than expected - Any renegotiation success stories when the appraisal value won't budge? : r/RealEstate - Reddit, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/u1mwg0/appraisal_came_in_much_lower_than_expected_any/
18. Jumbo Mortgages | Boston Real Estate Lawyer Pulgini & Norton, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.pulgininorton.com/jumbo-mortgages.html
19. Mortgage Contingency Clauses | Boston Real Estate Lawyer Pulgini & Norton, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.pulgininorton.com/mortgage-contingency-clauses.html
20. How Often Do Home Appraisals Come in Low? Here Are the Odds - HomeLight, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.homelight.com/blog/how-often-do-home-appraisals-come-in-low/
21. Home Sale Contingencies in Massachusetts: What Buyers & Sellers Need to Know - Ligris, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.ligris.com/2025/09/home-sale-contingencies-in-massachusetts-what-buyers-sellers-need-to-know/
22. Massachusetts Real Estate Transfers Over $1M Face New Tax Rules, accessed December 4, 2025, https://darroweverett.com/massachusetts-real-estate-transfers-2025-rule-legal-analysis/
23. Massachusetts Unveils New Real Estate Withholding Tax on High-Value Property Transfers, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.aprio.com/massachusetts-unveils-new-real-estate-withholding-tax-on-high-value-property-transfers-ins-article-tax/
24. New Massachusetts Home Inspection Law Takes Effect: What Brookline Buyers and Sellers Need to Know - The Bushari Team, accessed December 4, 2025, https://bushari.com/new-massachusetts-home-inspection-law-takes-effect-what-brookline-buyers-and-sellers-need-to-know/
25. Newton Housing Market: House Prices | Centre Realty Group, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.centrerealtygroup.com/newton-ma-real-estate-market-update-2025/
Need Custom Analysis?
Want deeper insights for a specific property or neighborhood? Get a custom research report tailored to your needs—from individual property analysis to comprehensive market overviews.
Request Custom Analysis