Zoning ReformHousing PolicyMBTA Communities ActHousing SupplyBoston Real EstateAffordability CrisisExclusionary ZoningHousing ProductionLand Use RegulationsGreater BostonHousing ScarcityPolicy AnalysisSection 3AMissing Middle Housing

Zoning as the Supply Constraint: A Policy Analysis of Housing Scarcity and Affordability in the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area

How local zoning and land-use regulations—characterized by extreme complexity in the core city and exclusionary restrictions in the suburbs—are the single greatest non-market constraint on housing production

December 12, 2025

48 min read

Boston Property Navigator Research Team•Housing Policy Analysis & Real Estate Market Research

The Greater Boston Metropolitan Statistical Area is navigating a severe, decades-long affordability and supply crisis that directly threatens regional economic competitiveness and perpetuates socioeconomic inequality. This analysis demonstrates that local zoning and land-use regulations are the single greatest non-market constraint on housing production. While state initiatives like the MBTA Communities Act provide a crucial legislative foundation, local resistance and bureaucratic inertia continue to stifle the necessary volume of 'as-of-right' development. Comprehensive reform must prioritize the radical simplification of the City of Boston's regulatory framework and aggressive state-level enforcement of regional density mandates.

📋

Executive Summary: The Mandate for Systemic Zoning Reform

The Greater Boston Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is currently navigating a severe, decades-long affordability and supply crisis that directly threatens regional economic competitiveness and perpetuates socioeconomic inequality. The core finding of this analysis is that local zoning and land-use regulations—characterized by extreme complexity in the core city and exclusionary restrictions in the suburbs—are the single greatest non-market constraint on housing production. While state initiatives like the MBTA Communities Act provide a crucial legislative foundation, local resistance and bureaucratic inertia continue to stifle the necessary volume of 'as-of-right' development. Comprehensive reform must prioritize the radical simplification of the City of Boston's regulatory framework and aggressive state-level enforcement of regional density mandates to unlock genuine housing supply elasticity.

📊1. The Boston MSA Housing and Economic Imperative

This section establishes the empirical dimensions of the crisis, linking the housing shortage directly to diminished economic vitality.

🏘️1.1. Quantification of the Regional Housing Deficit: Current Needs and Future Projections

The housing crisis in the Greater Boston MSA is quantified by a persistent, systemic failure to build sufficient housing units, leading to a critical cumulative deficit. Historical data confirms that statewide permitting levels in Massachusetts remain significantly depressed, remaining well below the peaks reached in the 1970s and 1980s. This sustained underproduction has led to a major gap between housing availability and population needs.

The scale of the required intervention is substantial. Analysis of future population growth and housing obsolescence indicates that Gateway Cities alone should aim to produce 83,000 new homes over the next 10 years. This demanding target is segmented into three components: 36,000 units are needed immediately to meet the existing shortage; 39,000 units must be produced to accommodate projected 5% household growth over the decade; and an additional 8,000 units are required to replace those lost to obsolescence. Across the broader Boston metro area, the deficit is estimated to exceed 40,000 homes, which constitutes roughly 13% of the existing total housing stock.

⚠️

Critical Warning: Construction Pipeline Collapse

Compounding the long-term deficit is a dramatic collapse in the future construction pipeline. Despite the addition of nearly 71,000 units in the Greater Boston metro since 2020, demonstrating some recent success in construction headway, this momentum is rapidly fading. The volume of building permits pulled by developers in Greater Boston plunged nearly 67% in just three years, falling from 15,019 units in 2021 to under 9,000 in 2024. Year-to-date permit data for 2025 shows an even bleaker forecast, running 44% below the levels recorded for the same period four years prior. The massive drop in permits since the 2021 peak suggests that restrictive land use rules, when combined with rising construction costs stemming from tariffs and potential labor shortages, now function as a decisive financial barrier.

Zoning costs, once a significant hurdle, have become the factor that renders many necessary projects financially unfeasible under current economic conditions, directly predicting a supply contraction in the next two to three years.

💰1.2. The Affordability Crisis: Rent Burden and Home Price Disparity

The lack of supply translates directly into severe market stress and rapidly rising costs. Boston ranks as the nation's fifth-most expensive housing market due to the tight supply and persistently high demand. The rental market is robust but highly pressurized; average rents surged 2.7% year-over-year to reach $2,860 in the second quarter of 2024, securing Boston's ninth spot among major U.S. cities for annual rent growth. This accelerated growth is driven by high, stable occupancy rates, measured at 96.0% in Q2 2024, alongside strengthening demand.

$2,860

Average Apartment Rent (Q2 2024)

2.7% Y-o-Y growth

96.0%

Occupancy Rate

Q2 2024

5th most expensive

National Ranking

Housing market

9th highest

Rent Growth Ranking

Major U.S. cities

The housing shortage has created intensely stratified and exclusionary home prices. Across Greater Boston, wealthy suburbs—including Brookline, Cambridge, Wellesley, and Weston—maintain median single-family home prices exceeding $2 million (Year-to-Date through June 2024). Conversely, only a handful of municipalities in the region, such as Brockton, Chelsea, and Lowell, still offer median single-family home prices below $500,000.

📈

The Wage-Price Divergence Crisis

This disparity highlights a severe macroeconomic imbalance between housing costs and income growth. Since 2012, while wages have grown by less than 50% in the Boston metro, home price appreciation has skyrocketed by 147% overall. The increase is especially acute at the low end of the market, where prices have risen by an astonishing 178% over the same period. This wide divergence between housing costs and earnings creates extreme pressure on entry-level workers and families. This structural constraint on supply translates into a rapid, escalating mechanism of wealth transfer from renters and low-income prospective buyers, rendering comfortable living in Boston increasingly impossible for the majority of residents, with a high concentration of residents classified as rent-burdened.

🚪1.3. Economic and Demographic Consequences: Out-migration and Labor Market Constraints

The high cost of housing fundamentally undermines the region's economic health. High housing costs and the steady out-migration of families from Greater Boston confirm the simple reality that the region is failing to build enough homes. This insufficiency results in residential overcrowding, delayed household formation, and excessively long commutes.

This dynamic poses a significant challenge to the regional labor market. Employers struggle to find enough workers to fill open positions because talented, skilled people are choosing to leave the region, stretched thin by housing expenses. The high cost of living impedes regional economic function. Furthermore, when wealthy suburbs maintain extremely high prices through exclusionary zoning (large lots), they restrict their own housing production, forcing concentrated demand and resulting price escalation back into the core cities and denser Gateway Cities. The failure of suburban zoning acts as a hidden regional tax, forcing core city residents, many of whom are disproportionately Black and Latinx, to bear the resulting inflation in rents and home prices.

An adequate housing supply is demonstrated to support crucial societal objectives, including social mobility, economic growth, cultural vibrancy, and the strengthening of the tax base. Zoning reform is therefore paramount to ensuring the sustained vitality and competitiveness of the Boston MSA.

Metric	Value/Rate	Source Context
Projected 10-Year Housing Production Need (Gateway Cities)	83,000 units total	Includes existing deficit, projected growth, and obsolescence
Current Housing Shortage (Estimated)	>40,000 homes (Boston metro estimate)	Significant supply gap relative to demand
Average Apartment Rent (Q2 2024)	$2,860 (2.7% Y-o-Y growth)	Outpacing national average, securing high cost ranking
Median Low-End Home Price Appreciation (Since 2012)	178% increase	Far outpaces wage growth (<50%), driving crisis
Residential Permit Decline (2021 to 2025 YTD)	44% decrease (Jan-July 2025 vs. 2021)	Warning sign for future construction pipeline

⚖️2. The Regulatory Anatomy of Housing Scarcity

The high costs observed in the Boston MSA are not solely the result of market demand, but rather the measurable consequence of local zoning codes and land-use regulations that function as intentional, structural impediments to the elasticity of housing supply.

🏛️2.1. Historical Roots of Exclusionary Zoning: Segregation and Wealth Accumulation

The implementation of modern zoning laws is demonstrably linked to mechanisms of social and economic exclusion. Historically, zoning practices were employed by affluent communities specifically to boost property values and decrease tax burdens while actively impeding the influx of non-white residents.

This legacy of discriminatory land use policies spans decades and has intentionally created racially segregated communities with concentrated areas of poverty. Research indicates that the adoption of zoning practices by early-adopting cities, particularly after the 1926 Supreme Court ruling in Euclid v. Ambler, correlated with a substantial 50% increase in racial and economic segregation between 1900 and 1940. Today, residential racial segregation in the Boston area significantly exceeds the national average.

🔍

The Segregation Reality in Greater Boston

The resulting residential segregation means that Black and Latinx/Hispanic residents are heavily concentrated within urban core areas. As of 2018, 32% of Black residents and 16% of Latinx/Hispanic residents of Massachusetts lived in Boston, compared to the state's overall population breakdown of 7% Black and 12% Latinx/Hispanic. Continued resistance to density in affluent suburbs, often justified as preserving 'local character', is functionally perpetuating this historical racial and economic inequality by limiting housing choices outside of resource-constrained urban areas. Zoning reform is thus fundamentally necessary to disrupt existing patterns of residential segregation.

🚫2.2. The Mechanics of Supply Restriction: Single-Family Zoning and Minimum Lot Requirements

The primary mechanism for supply restriction across the region is the pervasive use of density limits. Restrictive land use regulations significantly decrease the elasticity of housing supply, ensuring that housing stock fails to meet demand. Across the Boston metro, much of the residential land base remains locked into single-family zoning.

In the surrounding suburban communities, exclusion is enforced through strict dimensional standards. Regulations such as minimum lot sizes are deliberately imposed to restrict production and inflate home prices. A significant number of communities impose minimum lot sizes greater than 20,000 square feet, and over 40% of municipalities feature minimum lot sizes exceeding 35,000 square feet. These requirements effectively create a price floor and restrict market entry. Furthermore, bylaws enforce specific physical limitations, such as building height limits (e.g., a 41-foot maximum in Needham) and complex conveyance restrictions designed to prohibit the creation of additional building lots.

🏠

The Missing Middle Housing Crisis

These two distinct strategies—simple, low-density mandates in the suburbs and complex bureaucratic hurdles in the city—converge to limit supply elasticity across the entire region. Critically, these zoning mechanisms have effectively eliminated the feasibility of 'missing middle' housing types—such as duplexes, triplexes, and small multifamily buildings—which are necessary for moderate-income families and once formed the economic backbone of many Massachusetts communities. These density limitations severely restrict construction efficiencies and economies of scale, making medium-density development financially unviable.

📚2.3. Boston's Bureaucratic Impediment: Complexity and Permitting Friction

While suburbs implement exclusion through rigid requirements, the City of Boston proper achieves scarcity through excessive regulatory complexity and bureaucratic friction. The City of Boston's zoning code is needlessly complex and absurdly long, totaling nearly 4,000 pages. This massive length is striking; it is nearly 40% longer than New York City's code, despite New York having thirteen times the population and six times the land area.

~4,000 pages

Boston Zoning Code Length

Extreme complexity

~2,900 pages

NYC Zoning Code Length

40% shorter than Boston

~700,000

Boston Population

13× smaller than NYC

~48 sq mi

Boston Land Area

6× smaller than NYC

This complexity leads to inconsistency, inequity, and excessive reliance on variances from the Zoning Board of Appeal (ZBA). The resulting cumbersome approval process grants inordinate power to local neighborhood groups with a 'NIMBY-first mindset'. These 'self-appointed guardians' wield undue influence with no public accountability, turning necessary housing projects into protracted, costly, discretionary fights.

💸

The Pay-to-Play System

This system of discretionary approval imposes high transaction costs, often requiring 'community benefits' handouts—a 'pay-to-play name of the game'. These added costs inflate the final price of housing, thereby further limiting total supply. The length and inconsistency of the 4,000-page code and the dominance of discretionary review disproportionately raise the transaction costs of development, favoring only large, well-capitalized developers and freezing out smaller builders who might otherwise focus on the 'missing middle' housing. The failure to simplify the code limits market diversity and is a direct contributor to the decline in new permits.

🚇3. The State Response: Analyzing the MBTA Communities Act (MGL c. 40A, § 3A)

The MBTA Communities Act, adopted in January 2021, represents the state's most significant legislative attempt to overcome fragmented local zoning and enforce regional density, recognizing that local control had failed the metropolitan economy.

📋3.1. Policy Intent and Mechanism: Requiring Multi-Family Zoning As-of-Right

The Act requires 177 cities and towns within the MBTA service area to establish 'at least 1 district of reasonable size in which multi-family housing is permitted as of right'. The mechanism is designed to promote transit-oriented development (TOD) by requiring municipalities to comply with stringent standards, thus replacing discretionary, restrictive local zoning with clear, state-mandated standards.

The statutory requirements are specific:

•The district must allow a minimum gross density of 15 units per acre.
•The zoning must be suitable for families with children and cannot impose age restrictions.
•Where feasible, the district must be located within a half mile of a public transportation station (commuter rail, subway, bus, or ferry).
•The district must be capable of producing new units equivalent to 25% of the community's existing year-round housing units.

The ability of the state to mandate as-of-right zoning is critical, as it removes the local political mechanism—the discretionary review process—that has historically been used to cap density. The state's constitutional authority to restrict local zoning, validated by precedent involving Chapter 40B, provides the necessary legal foundation to overcome traditional NIMBY opposition.

⚔️3.2. Implementation Challenges and Political Resistance

Despite the economic urgency, the Act has been met with significant political resistance, particularly from towns that lack a tradition of multi-family housing. The primary objection raised by non-compliant communities centers on relinquishing local control over zoning, with critics arguing that residents, not the state, know best what development makes sense for their town.

Opponents frequently invoke common arguments to justify resistance: the necessity of preserving 'community character', and concerns that population growth will overburden local infrastructure, such as schools. The resistance is intense because the mandate directly removes the local political mechanism that has historically capped density.

🏛️

Active Non-Compliance

This resistance has resulted in active non-compliance. In Milton, a compliant zoning article was invalidated by a town-wide referendum in February 2024, leading to the town's non-compliance. At least 15 towns were non-compliant as of late 2024. The litigation and denial of funds that follow non-compliance signify the state's recognition that discretionary local control is fundamentally incompatible with achieving regional housing goals.

🥕3.3. Enforcement and Incentives: The 'Carrot and Stick' Approach

The enforcement of the MBTA Act relies on financial incentives and penalties, often referred to as the 'carrot and stick' approach.

The 'stick' mechanism involves the denial of state funding. Non-compliant communities become ineligible for specific state housing, infrastructure, and transportation funding programs. For example, Middleboro, which challenged the Act, was denied a $1 million MassWorks grant before complying. The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office has also filed a lawsuit against Milton to compel compliance.

The 'carrot' mechanism is the reward of grant eligibility and the subsequent economic benefits of increased supply. As of March 2025, 51 municipalities were fully compliant. While the Act does not mandate affordable units, mandating dense housing near transit (TOD) shifts the focus from simple subsidies to increasing supply elasticity in high-demand areas. Economic modeling suggests that relaxing density restrictions leads to meaningful increases in multi-family supply and subsequent reductions in rents, making the Act a vital regional economic tool. However, the state must ensure that the discretion given to communities on the location and size of multi-family districts does not result in zones being placed in unbuildable or commercially unfeasible areas, thereby undermining the law's ultimate production goals.

📉4. The Empirical Failure of Incrementalism and the Need for Density

Empirical data confirms that incremental fixes are insufficient to address a crisis caused by fundamental constraints on supply. Structural zoning reform is necessary to achieve housing supply elasticity.

📊4.1. The Critical Decline in Permitting Activity and the Regulatory Cost Factor

The precipitous decline in housing construction permits confirms that the current regulatory structure is actively inhibiting development. In Boston proper, permit counts in 2023 and 2024 (2,219 permitted in 2024) were the lowest since 2012. This contraction confirms that the overly complex regulatory environment is not merely slowing development but actively choking it off, leading to a massive decline in the expected supply pipeline.

The regulatory framework acts as a cost multiplier. Rising input costs, such as elevated tariffs and labor constraints, combine with the regulatory overhead imposed by archaic zoning and discretionary review to make the total development cost prohibitively high. This explains the severe plunge in permits. If zoning were streamlined (moving to predictable, as-of-right permitting), the margin for construction viability would expand, allowing projects to proceed even amid slightly higher material and labor costs. Zoning reform is therefore a crucial mitigation strategy against macroeconomic headwinds.

❌

The Failure of Incremental Approaches

The failure of localized solutions is evident. Incremental approaches, such as the City of Boston's Housing Strategy 2025, which focuses on token gestures like allowing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and subsidizing small parcels, are criticized as 'political cover' that fail to meaningfully increase supply in a land-scarce, expensive environment. Attempting to solve a supply shortage by merely stimulating demand is fundamentally insufficient; the path forward requires unleashing market forces by eliminating regulatory barriers.

📈4.2. Modeling the Impact of Zoning Relaxation and Supply Elasticity

High housing prices reflect high demand coupled with a severe restriction on supply. Economic analysis shows that since physical construction costs are relatively elastic, the binding constraint is the land component, which is strictly controlled by zoning.

Research confirms that reforming zoning practices—specifically relaxing maximum height and density restrictions—could lead to meaningful increases in the supply of multi-family housing and subsequent reductions in rents. Studies of zoning relaxation in other major cities demonstrate that increased density can lead to measurable average price reductions of 0.5%, with larger reductions of up to 6.2% observed in neighborhoods that received the largest supply shocks.

0.5%

Average Price Reduction

From zoning relaxation

6.2%

Maximum Price Reduction

In high-supply-shock neighborhoods

70,000+

Chapter 40B Units Built

Statewide since 1969

Massachusetts' Chapter 40B, which allows developers to override local zoning laws to build affordable housing, is valuable but insufficient. Analysis suggests that inclusionary zoning policies, while necessary, may only partially mitigate, and cannot substitute for, the necessity of relaxing fundamental density and land regulations to increase total supply and affordability.

✅4.3. Lessons from Targeted De-Restrictive Reforms

Targeted zoning reforms have proven effectiveness. In Minneapolis, specific actions such as legalizing ADUs (2015), eliminating parking requirements near transit (2015), and dropping citywide parking requirements (2021) demonstrably doubled the number of housing units permitted between 2015 and 2020. Specifically, eliminating excessive parking requirements removes a significant non-structural cost and space constraint, proving highly effective in accelerating housing stock growth.

🌱

Climate and Housing Alignment

Furthermore, restrictive zoning, by limiting density, forces residents into sprawling, automobile-dependent suburbs, increasing greenhouse gas emissions. The mandate for transit-oriented development (TOD) under the MBTA Act aligns housing growth with existing infrastructure, positioning zoning reform as not only an economic necessity but also a critical climate-friendly policy goal for the region.

🎯5. Policy Recommendations for Structural Zoning Reform

Addressing the scale of the Boston MSA's housing crisis requires aggressive, multi-jurisdictional action based on structural zoning reform, moving beyond incrementalism to systemic overhaul.

✂️5.1. Simplifying the Core Code: Moving from Discretionary Review to As-of-Right Zoning in Boston

The City of Boston must treat its nearly 4,000-page zoning code as an obsolete, contradictory document requiring immediate, comprehensive overhaul. The goal must be to reduce the code's length and eliminate internal contradictions to provide clear, predictable standards.

The reliance on complex, variance-dependent processes (ZBA) must be replaced with clear, predictable as-of-right standards. Discretionary review should be reserved only for large-scale, city-defining projects, not for standard residential developments. Crucially, the mechanisms that enable unelected neighborhood groups to hold housing projects hostage through the discretionary review process must be systematically dismantled. Public oversight should focus solely on the measurable impact of the development on infrastructure and city services, rather than subjective preferences often used to restrict density.

🏘️5.2. Mandating the Missing Middle: Statewide Action on Medium-Density Housing

State policy must mandate the legalization of medium-density housing to counteract the pervasive effect of single-family exclusive zoning.

This involves implementing statewide mandates that explicitly legalize duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes in currently single-family zones across all MBTA communities. Furthermore, the state should develop a centralized Missing Middle Design Guide and pre-approved plan sets. These standardized resources would offer clarity, predictability, and reduced architecture costs, particularly for small-scale developers, ensuring that policy changes translate into actual production. The state must also continue the trend of eliminating non-structural constraints, such as minimum parking requirements near transit, which are proven to accelerate housing stock growth.

⚖️5.3. Regional Accountability: Strengthening the MBTA Act Enforcement and Compliance Mechanisms

The MBTA Communities Act is the legislative cornerstone, and its enforcement must be rigorous.

The state must aggressively utilize the 'carrot and stick' approach. Denial of MassWorks and other capital infrastructure grants for non-compliant municipalities must be swift and universal to reinforce the regional obligation. This strict enforcement must be paired with robust technical assistance programs (e.g., provided by EOHLC) to help resistant communities navigate compliance and design. Additionally, local aid formulas should be re-examined to actively reward communities that meet or exceed their production targets, focusing on measurable housing output rather than mere zoning compliance.

💼5.4. Addressing Development Economics: Mitigating External Cost Factors

While zoning addresses the regulatory constraint, external economic factors (tariffs, labor shortages) threaten to 'slow development to a crawl'. State and city policy should explore mechanisms to mitigate these non-zoning costs. This includes investing in vocational training and recruitment programs to address potential construction worker shortages. Furthermore, to offset rising material and labor costs, the state should investigate streamlining and potentially reducing regulatory fees for categories of as-of-right middle housing to provide a necessary incentive for developers.

📝Conclusion

The housing crisis engulfing the Greater Boston MSA is not an unavoidable byproduct of success, but the direct, measurable consequence of a policy choice: the prioritization of fragmented, archaic, and exclusionary zoning over supply elasticity and regional equity. Restrictive land use has choked the housing market, leading to severe inflation in costs, driving away essential workforce talent, and institutionalizing socioeconomic segregation within the region.

The MBTA Communities Act represents a crucial, but incomplete, step toward mandating regional zoning alignment. Full resolution demands a comprehensive commitment to structural reform that radically simplifies complexity in the urban core and aggressively enforces density liberalization in the suburbs. Only by systematically removing zoning and land-use regulations as the binding constraint on supply can the Boston MSA unlock the construction necessary to stabilize costs, attract and retain its workforce, reverse historical segregation patterns, and secure its long-term economic future.

📚Works Cited

How many homes are we actually building? | Boston Indicators, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.bostonindicators.org/article-pages/2025/october/how-many-homes

2024 Gateway Cities Housing Monitor - MassINC, accessed December 4, 2025, https://massinc.org/research/2024-gateway-cities-housing-monitor/

Boston's Backward Housing Policy: More Demand Will Only Exacerbate the Supply Crisis, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.aei.org/housing-center/bostons-backward-housing-policy-more-demand-will-only-exacerbate-the-supply-crisis/

Boston Faces New Construction Crisis as Building Permits Plunge - Realtor.com, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/boston-ma-new-construction-permits-housing-report-2025/

Boston 2Q 2024 Market Report - MMG Real Estate Advisors, accessed December 4, 2025, https://mmgrea.com/boston-2q-2024-report/

Greater Boston Housing Report Card 2024 Interactive Data - The Boston Foundation, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.tbf.org/news-and-insights/reports/2024/november/greater-boston-housing-report-card-2024-interactive-data

A Look Into Reforming Boston's Zoning Codes, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.boston.gov/news/look-reforming-bostons-zoning-codes

Speak Up for Zoning Reform in Boston - Banker & Tradesman, accessed December 4, 2025, https://bankerandtradesman.com/speak-up-for-zoning-reform-in-boston/

How large lot zoning and other town regulations are driving up home prices, accessed December 4, 2025, https://commonwealthbeacon.org/uncategorized/how-large-lot-zoning-and-other-town-regulations-are-driving-up-home-prices/

Zoning Reforms Needed to Dismantle Discriminatory Land Use and Build More Affordable Housing - Boston Bar Association, accessed December 4, 2025, https://bostonbar.org/journal/zoning-reforms-needed-to-dismantle-discriminatory-land-use-and-build-more-affordable-housing/

The Impact of Zoning on Housing Affordability - National Bureau of Economic Research, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w8835/w8835.pdf

Rethinking Zoning to Increase Affordable Housing, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.nahro.org/journal_article/rethinking-zoning-to-increase-affordable-housing/

The Case Against the Case for Zoning - Georgetown Law, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.law.georgetown.edu/environmental-law-review/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2024/01/Lewyn-Article.pdf

The Two-Board Knot: Zoning, Schools, and Inequality - American Affairs Journal, accessed December 4, 2025, https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2017/11/two-board-knot-zoning-schools-inequality/

Panel Examines Impact of MBTA Communities Act - BC Law Magazine - Boston College, accessed December 4, 2025, https://lawmagazine.bc.edu/2025/04/policy-panel-examines-impact-on-implementing-mbta-communities-act/

151 4. DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS 4.1 Basic Requirements 4.1.1 Applicability No building or structure in any district shall - Needham Town Hall, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.needhamma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16661

Building Missing Middle Housing: Six Actions Massachusetts Can Take Beyond Policy Reform, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/building-missing-middle-housing-six-actions-massachusetts-can-take-beyond-policy-reform

BPDA Releases Analysis of City's Out of Date Zoning Code, Announces Restructuring of Planning Depart | Bostonplans.org, accessed December 4, 2025, http://www.bostonplans.org/news-calendar/news-updates/2023/09/13/bpda-releases-analysis-of-zoning-code

MBTA Communities Law Q&A - Mass.gov, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.mass.gov/info-details/mbta-communities-law-qa

MBTA Communities Act | Dover, MA, accessed December 4, 2025, https://doverma.gov/675/MBTA-Communities-Act

MBTA Communities Multi-Family Zoning Requirement - Milton, MA, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.miltonma.gov/301/MBTA-Communities-Multi-Family-Zoning-Req

15 Massachusetts towns are not in compliance with the MBTA Communities Act. Will they face legal consequences? - CBS News, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/mbta-communites-act-towns-not-comply/

MBTA Communities Compliance Map - Upzone Update - Boston Indicators, accessed December 4, 2025, https://mbtacommunities.bostonindicators.org/tracker-map/

Local Zoning Laws and the Supply of Multifamily Housing in Greater Boston, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/new-england-public-policy-center-research-report/2022/local-zoning-laws-and-the-supply-of-multifamily-housing-in-greater-boston.aspx

Boston's Economy 2024: Recovery, Resilience, and Growth, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.boston.gov/sites/default/files/file/2024/06/Economy-Report-Final-Embargo-Version.pdf

ESTIMATING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF ZONING REFORM - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.atlantafed.org/-/media/documents/news/conferences/2021/12/01/biennial-real-estate-conference/rexer.pdf

Beyond Zoning: A New Approach for Today's Cities - Harvard Graduate School of Design, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.gsd.harvard.edu/2023/08/matthew-kiefer-interview-about-boston-zoning/

Need Custom Analysis?

Want deeper insights for a specific property or neighborhood? Get a custom research report tailored to your needs—from individual property analysis to comprehensive market overviews.

Request Custom Analysis