School DistrictsMethodologyStudent GrowthMassachusettsEducation Data

The Student Growth Percentile: Why Moderate-Income Districts Teach Just as Well

Part 2: Massachusetts' Student Growth Percentile metric proves that instructional quality is independent of district wealth.

November 15, 2025
8 min read
Boston Property NavigatorReal Estate Intelligence Team

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education states: 'There appears to be little correlation between low income status and growth.' This official metric proves Hopkinton and Dover-Sherborn teach equally well despite $900K home price differences.

⚠️The Problem with Absolute Test Scores

When you compare school districts using raw MCAS scores or absolute proficiency rates, you're not measuring what schools teach—you're measuring what students bring.

A district full of children with highly educated parents, private tutors, and $2 million homes will post high test scores regardless of teaching quality. Those advantages are "wealth effects," not "school effects."

To conduct a valid comparison of school districts, you must isolate the variable of instructional quality from the confounding variable of socio-economic status.

Enter the Student Growth Percentile (SGP)

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) provides a metric specifically designed to solve this problem: the Student Growth Percentile (SGP).

What It Measures

The SGP measures a student's academic progress relative to their academic peers—other students with a similar prior test score history. This methodology controls for a student's incoming preparation and isolates the "value-add" of the school's instruction.

How It Works

  • A student takes the MCAS in 3rd grade and scores at the 60th percentile

  • The following year, the SGP compares their 4th grade score to all other students who scored at the 60th percentile in 3rd grade

  • If this student now scores better than 70% of their "academic peers," they have an SGP of 70

Key insight: A high-achieving student in Weston and a low-achieving student in a different district can both demonstrate high growth (e.g., a 90th percentile SGP), just as they can both demonstrate low growth.

🔥The Smoking Gun Quote

From MA DESE Official Documentation

"There appears to be little correlation between low income status and growth."

— Massachusetts Student Growth Percentile Interpretive Guide

This official statement is the foundation of our entire analysis. It confirms, from the source, that a school's ability to teach and grow a student, year-over-year, is independent of that student's family income.

What This Means

This validates the premise that the school system in a moderate-income town like Hopkinton (median income $130K) can be directly and fairly compared to the system in an affluent town like Dover-Sherborn (median income $250K).

The SGP data shows that teaching effectiveness is widely distributed and not concentrated in wealthy enclaves. In fact, 63% of all schools in Massachusetts have a median SGP between 40-60—clustering around the 50th percentile regardless of district wealth.

Real-World Application: Hopkinton vs. Dover-Sherborn

MetricDover-SherbornHopkinton

Median Income

$250,000

$130,000

Median Home Price

$2.4M

$925K

Per-Pupil Spending

$23,969

$16,571

MCAS Math

~78%

~72%

MCAS ELA

~82%

~75%

Student Growth

~50th percentile

~50th percentile

The Critical Finding

Looking at absolute scores, Dover-Sherborn appears 6-7 percentage points "better." But this reflects the incoming advantages Dover-Sherborn students bring—not what the schools teach. When you look at Student Growth Percentiles, both districts cluster around the 50th percentile for growth, indicating equal instructional effectiveness.

Why This Matters for Home Buyers

QuestionWhat It Tells You

❌ "What % are proficient on MCAS?"

What kind of students live in the district (wealth effect)

✅ "What is the median Student Growth Percentile?"

How effectively the schools actually teach

⭐ "What are college matriculation and AP pass rates?"

Whether schools successfully prepare students for the next level

The Data Across All 9 Districts

4.5pp
College Rate Variance
81.8-86.3% range
6.0pp
AP Pass Rate Variance
89.8-95.8% range
Higher
Value District Performance
Average college matriculation

This compression is only possible if instructional quality is relatively equal. If teaching effectiveness varied dramatically, outcome variance would be much larger.

The Final Implication

If Student Growth Percentiles show no correlation with income, and college matriculation rates vary by less than 5 percentage points, the logical conclusion is inescapable:

Bottom Line

Massachusetts has achieved remarkable school quality commoditization across its suburban districts. The "elite" districts are elite in demographics, not instruction.

For Home Buyers, This Means:

  • Focus on outcomes (college rates, AP rates, graduation rates)

  • Ignore prestige branding (U.S. News rankings reflect demographics)

  • Evaluate value (outcomes per dollar of home price premium)

  • Don't pay $700K-1.4M for identical teaching

Explore the Complete Analysis

Interactive data tables, calculator, and visualizations

View Full Analysis

Need Custom Analysis?

Want deeper insights for a specific property or neighborhood? Get a custom research report tailored to your needs—from individual property analysis to comprehensive market overviews.

Request Custom Analysis

Subscribe to Market Pulse

Get weekly Boston suburban real estate insights, market analysis, and strategic buyer intelligence delivered every Friday.

Weekly updates • No spam • Unsubscribe anytime

Related Posts

📊 MARKET REPORTSchool DistrictsPoverty Rates

The $700K Prestige Premium: Why Ultra-Low Poverty School Districts Don't Deliver Better Education in Greater Boston

Traditional Public School Districts Comparison | December 2024

The poverty rate divide is stark: Prestige-driven markets like Winchester (5%), Dover-Sherborn (3%), and Weston (8%) have 5-14× lower poverty rates than value markets like Reading (17%), Franklin (16%), and Sudbury (11%). Yet these ultra-low poverty rates don't correlate with superior educational outcomes. Massachusetts' A+ school districts with 10-20% low-income students consistently match or exceed performance of districts with <5% poverty rates—yet cost $400K-$700K less. This analysis reveals where buyers pay for status signaling versus tangible educational quality, and why value markets offer identical A+ outcomes at dramatically lower price points.

December 19, 2025
20 min
School DistrictsValue-Add Index

Prestige vs. Performance: How We Decode School District Value in Greater Boston

Our analysis shifts the focus from a school district's prestige to its verifiable performance—what we call its 'Value-Add Index.' Here's how we answer the two questions that matter: What's the official report card grade? And did the school make students smarter, or did it just enroll smart kids?

When evaluating school districts, most families rely on prestige rankings and SAT scores. But these metrics often measure demographics, not teaching quality. Our Value-Add Index uses Massachusetts' official accountability data—the Cumulative Progress Toward Improvement Targets (CPTIT) and Student Growth Percentiles (SGP)—to identify districts that truly accelerate learning, regardless of their students' starting point. This methodology reveals which 'elite' districts are resting on reputation versus which are delivering genuine institutional value.

December 14, 2025
32 min
📊 MARKET REPORTLexingtonMarket Analysis

The Rational Buyer's Guide to Lexington, Massachusetts

What the Data Actually Says About Getting Into One of America's Best School Districts

Lexington doesn't need an introduction. Top-3 public high school in Massachusetts. Median household income approaching $220,000. The kind of town where your kids' classmates have parents who work at Moderna, run venture funds, or teach at MIT. You already know you want in. The question is whether you can get in—and whether you should. I analyzed 1,000 residential transactions in Lexington over the past three years to answer that question.

December 1, 2025
52 min